Key areas of management activities in universities and scientific organizations in the context of developing profiles of soft skills

The article examines the differentiation of management profiles in higher education and scientific organizations. The relevance of the research is determined by the growing role of management personnel in the context of the transformation of Russia’s higher education system and the expansion of managers’ areas of responsibility.
The aim is to identify functional areas of management activity most distinct in terms of required competencies and to substantiate the feasibility of developing independent soft-skills profiles for them. The research is conducted in a focus group format involving 15 experts: senior officials of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, university rectors, vice-rectors, directors of research organizations, and their deputies. The discussion resulted in a final list of ten areas of managerial activity, ranging from academic affairs and research to security management and human resources. The authors also identify behavioral performance indicators for leaders and key professional competencies significant for each functional specialization. Additionally, the article outlines general behavioral features of successful managers across all domains and criteria for identifying high-potential candidates for inclusion in the managerial personnel reserve.
The research results can be applied to the development of assessment, selection and leadership development programs in the scientific and educational sector, as well as to formulating qualification requirements for the talent pools of universities and research institutions.

1. Rosser J. The role of the university President in realizing the multicultural university. American Behavioral Scientist. 1990;34(2):223–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642900340020 10. EDN: JKKOTR.

2. Komissarov A. G. Competencies’ assessment methodology and senior managerial personnel selection. Lomonosov Economics Journal . 2023;1:63–85. https://doi.org/10.55959/msu0130-0105-658-1-4. EDN: KDTCWJ. (In Russ.).

3. Reznik S. D. Rectors career: What is it? University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2009;5:7–14. (In Russ.).

4. Reznik S. D., Fomin G. B. Organisation of the university rector’s activity. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2013;1:279–283. EDN: PHJKKZ. (In Russ.).

5. Galazhuinsky E. V. Vostrebovannyye kompetentsii rukovoditeley universitetov: mirovyye trendy vs rossiyskiye protsessy v obrazovanii. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2017;21(2):6–8. https://doi.org/10.15826/ umpa.2017.02.013. EDN: YRORQL. (In Russ.).

6. Zhdanov P. A., Trostuanskaya I. B., Barsukov A. A. [et al.]. The modern rector: competencies required in the global academic marketplace. Educational Studies Moscow. 2019;2:129158. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2019-2-129-158. EDN: QLXVSW. (In Russ.).

7. Kalmay O. M., Yudina E. S., Sherina O. A. [et al.]. Talent pool as a factor of the competitiveness enhancement of the modern university. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2016;101(1):98–108. EDN: VQWPJL. (In Russ.).

8. Volkova A. V., Kuzminov M. M., Mitryakova O. L. [et al.]. Formation of leaders’ reserve for educational and academic organizations. Higher Education in Russia. 2022;31(5):924. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-5-9-24. EDN: JTIHOS. (In Russ.).

9. Popova E. A., Ibragimova M. Kh. Personnel evaluation as an essential element of university strategic management. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2017;21(2):52–63. https:// doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.02.02. EDN: YRORTD. (In Russ.).

10. Grudzinskiy A. O., Zakharova L. G., Saralieva Z. M. Technology of fundamental functional competences model development for the university personnel in the context of improving competitiveness. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2014;1:24–32. EDN: SCPMHF. (In Russ.).

11. Tetraz V. A. Development of a competence model for university staff: theory and practice. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law. 2022;32(4):669–675. https://doi. org/10.35634/2412-9593-2022-32-4-669-675. EDN: KSNVIK. (In Russ.).

12. Komarova V. V., Milaya A. V., Lezhenina A. A. The university’s corporate competence model as a mechanism for effective personnel management. Leadership and Management. 2024;11(1):373–390. https://doi.org/10.18334/lim.11.1.120227. EDN: JVHUHH. (In Russ.).

13. Belkin V. E. Comparative analysis of methods for assessing management competencies of Russian universitiesю Lomonosov Economics Journal. 2025;1(43):114–123. https:// doi.org/10.24412/2312-6647-2025-143-114-123. EDN: FCVPST. (In Russ.).

14. Lomonosov A. V. Portrait of a field-oriented HEI ViceRector for education. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics. 2023;2:28–32. https://doi.org/10.24158.spp.2023.2.3. EDN: JQEMWI. (In Russ.).

15. Aleksandrova N. A. Talent pool management of the university complex: methodology for analyzing the need for management personnel. Human Progress. 2024;10(2):9. https:// doi.org/10.34709/IM.1102.9. EDN: JFKBLO. (In Russ.).

16. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ: British Medical Journal: International Edition. 1995;311:299–302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.

17. EDN: CBTHYB.

18. Hogan R., Hogan J. Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 2001;9:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00162.

19. Heifetz R. A. Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press, 1994. 348 p. ISBN 0-674-51858-6. (Гарвардское университетское издательство (Harvard University Press) внесено в реестр нежелательных организаций на территории Российской Федерации).

20. Bass B. M. Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist. 1997;52(2):130–139. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130. EDN: HEZMGF.