Preview

Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity

Advanced search

Narrative meaning: Semiosis and identity

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2026-11-1-70-77

EDN: TMMBTF

Abstract

The article examines the narrative meaning that allows constructing an understanding of the surrounding world, oneself, and human actions through stories that give events, motives, and goals meaning, forming a single narrative plot. Ontological, epistemological, and hermeneutic prerequisites for meaning-making are analyzed. The narrative meaning is demonstrated, linking personal experience with cultural, ethical, and temporal contexts in which one’s own existence acquires a narrative form through the linking of events into a plot, in which not randomness or absurdity is revealed, but a direction in the context of which teleology manifests itself as one of the possible modalities of meaning. It is proved that the narrative meaning is revealed as a synthetic category representing the ontological rootedness of man in the world, the epistemological activity of consciousness, and hermeneutic experience. The key role of narrative as a means of semiosis is recognized. It is argued that in the context of the formation of personal identity, the narrative meaning of autobiographical narration acts as a key basis for maintaining a sense of one’s own authenticity in the face of the modality of ‘unnatural’ existence.

About the Author

V. V. Babich
National Research Tomsk State University
Russian Federation

BABICH Vladimir Vladimirovich, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Master’s Degree of the History of Philosophy and Logic Department

Tomsk

AuthorID (RSCI): 752690



References

1. Schlick M. Voprosy etiki [Ethical Questions]. Logos. 2008. No. 1 (64). P. 188–206. EDN: TJIUJJ. (In Russ.).

2. Davletshina A. M. Ekzistentsializm M. Shlika? Morits Shlik i yego etika molodosti [M. Schlick’s Existentialism? Moritz Schlick and His Ethics of Youth]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2020. Vol. 24, no. 3. P. 445–456. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-3-445-456. EDN: FZZSRQ. (In Russ.).

3. Chomsky N. Sistemy vlasti: Besedy o global’nykh demokraticheskikh vosstaniyakh i novykh vyzovakh amerikanskoy imperii [Power Systems: Conversations on Global Democratic Uprisings and the New Challenges to U.S. Empire]. Moscow, 2014. 200 p. (In Russ.).

4. Kuzmina M. A. Smysl kak mezhdistsiplinarnyy ob’’yekt [The Meaning as a Subject of Interdisciplinary Studies]. Voprosy Filosofii. 2021. No. 8. P. 130–141. DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-20218-130-141. EDN: RERRTD. (In Russ.).

5. Lektorskiy V. A. Zachem nuzhna segodnya filosofiya [Why Do We Need Philosophy Today?]. Voprosy Filosofii. 2017. No. 7. P. 140–143. EDN: YZAYKL. (In Russ.).

6. Davydov A. P. Mekhanizm smysloobrazovaniya kak predmet filosofskogo analiza [Mechanism of Semantic Formation as a Subject of Philosophical Analysis]. Mir psikhologii. World of Psychology. 2001. No. 2. P. 35–45. EDN: VHBNCE. (In Russ.).

7. Heidegger M. Vremya i bytiye [Being and Time]. Metafizika. Metaphysics. 2011. No. 1 (1). P. 205–224. EDN: TDXUGD. (In Russ.).

8. Wittgenstein L. Filosofskiye issledovaniya [Philosophical Investigations]. Moscow, 2018. 352 p. (In Russ.).

9. Taylor C. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 602 p.

10. MacIntyre A. Posle dobrodeteli: Issledovaniya teorii morali [After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory]. Moscow, 2000. 384 p. ISBN 978-5-88373-700-7. (In Russ.).

11. Husserl E. Kartezianskiye razmyshleniya [Cartesian Meditations]. Saint Petersburg, 2000. 316 p. (In Russ.).

12. Peirce C. S. How to Make Our Ideas Clear. Popular Science Monthly. 1878. No. 12. P. 286–302.

13. Dewey J. Rekonstruktsiya v filosofii. Problemy cheloveka [Reconstruction in Philosophy. Problems of Men]. Moscow, 2003. 494 p. ISBN 5-250-01849-1. (In Russ.).

14. Grebenev A. N. Cherez interpretatsiyu k ponimaniyu v ramkakh germenevticheskogo kruga [From Interpretation to Understanding within the Bound of Hermeneutic Circle]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina. Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal. 2008. No. 5 (19). P. 111–120. EDN: JWMKRT. (In Russ.).

15. Gadamer H.-G. Filosofskiye osnovaniya 20 veka [The Philosophical Foundations of the Twentieth Century]. Aktual’nost’ Prekrasnogo. Moscow, 1991. 368 p. (In Russ.).

16. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [The Aesthetics of Verbal Creativity]. Moscow, 1979. 289 p. (In Russ.).

17. Smirnova N. M. Ponyatiye smysla v zerkale germenevticheskikh praktik [The Concept of Meaning in the Mirror of Hermeneutic Practices]. Voprosy Sotsialnoy Teorii. 2018. Vol. 10. P. 25–37. DOI: 10.30936/2227-7951-2018-10-25-37. EDN: UYFBIG. (In Russ.).

18. Neretina S. S. Slovo i tekst v srednevekovoy kul’ture. Kontseptualizm Abelyara [Word and Text in Medieval Culture. Abelard’s Conceptualism]. Moscow, 1994. 216 p. (In Russ.).

19. Bruner J. Life as Narrative. Social Research: An International Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 71, no. 3. P. 691–710. DOI: 10.1353/sor.2004.0045.

20. Tiupa V. I. Narratologiya i etika [Narratology and Ethics]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Yazyk i literatura. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature. 2022. Vol. 19, no. 1. P. 29–44. DOI: 10.21638/spbu09.2022.102. EDN: UNLZXB. (In Russ.).

21. Ricoeur P. Du texte à l’action. Essais d’hermmeutique, II. Paris: Seuil, 1986. 409 p.

22. Mikhaylova G. P. Chitaya «Gamleta», ili Obreteniye samosti [Reading “Hamlet”, or the Finding Self]. Voprosy Russkoy Literatury. 2016. No. 4. P. 14–31. EDN: YWQVAT. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Babich V.V. Narrative meaning: Semiosis and identity. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2026;11(1):70-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2026-11-1-70-77. EDN: TMMBTF

Views: 167

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0488 (Print)
ISSN 2541-7983 (Online)