Incidental knowledge defended
https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-3-92-100
EDN: ZZJVZZ
Abstract
The paper analyses epistemic happenstance and argues for the possibility of incidental knowledge. It considers how minimal concepts of knowledge, reflecting various basic intuitions, operate in situations where there is an influence of chance or fortunate circumstances. Based on this, a distinction is made between epistemic coincidence and epistemic causation randomness. Both types of epistemic happenstance are broader alternatives to the narrow understanding of epistemic luck that has developed in contemporary epistemology. As an example, the influence of the epistemic causation randomness on the formation of intellectual virtues is considered.
About the Author
A. M. Kardash
Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Kardash Aleksey Mikhaylovich, Postgraduate of the Theory of Cognition and Methodology of Science Department
AuthorlD (RSCI): 1145532
ResearcherlD: AGN-9675-2022
Minsk
References
1. Unger P. An Analysis of Factual Knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy. 1968. Vol. 65, no. 6. P. 157–170. DOI: 10.2307/2024203.
2. Dretske F. Conclusive Reasons. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1971. Vol. 49, no. 1. P. 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/00048407112341001.
3. Ravitch H. Knowledge and the Principle of Luck. Philosophical Studies. 1976. Vol. 30, no. 5. P. 347–349. DOI: 10.1007/BF00357933.
4. Zagzebski L. Virtues of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 384 p.
5. Engel M. Is Epistemic Luck Compatible with Knowledge? The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 1992. Vol. 30, no. 2. P. 59–75. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1992.tb01715.x.
6. Pritchard D. Virtue Epistemology and Epistemic Luck. Metaphilosophy. 2003. Vol. 34, no. 1-2. P. 106–130. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9973.00263.
7. Hiller A., Neta R. Safety and Epistemic Luck. Synthese. 2007. Vol. 158, № 3. P. 303–313. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-006-9041-0.
8. Pritchard D. Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology. The Journal of Philosophy. 2012. Vol. 109, no. 3. P. 247–279. DOI: 10.5840/ jphil201210939.
9. Navarro J. Epistemic Luck and Epistemic Risk. Erkenntnis. 2023. Vol. 88, no. 3. P. 929–950. DOI: 10.1007/s10670-021-00387-9.
10. Pavese C., Henne P., Beddor B. Epistemic Luck, Knowledge-How, and Intentional Action // Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 2023. Vol. 10, no. 36. P. 1019–1056. DOI: 10.3998/ergo.4666.
11. Kardash A. M. Chto est’ v izvestnoy stat’ye Edmunda Gettiyera [What Is Mentioned in the Famous Article by Edmund Gettier]. Sibirskiy filosofskiy zhurnal. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2023 Vol. 21, no. 1. P. 127–139. DOI: 10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-1-127-139. EDN: IZMHQF. (In Russ.).
12. Greco J. Virtue and Luck, Epistemic and Otherwise. Metaphilosophy. 2003. Vol. 34, no. 3. P. 353–366. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9973.00278.
13. Sosa E. A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 164 p.
14. Elster Y. Kislyy vinograd. Issledovaniye provalov ratsional’nosti [Sour Grapes: A Study of Rationality Failures]. Moscow, 2018. 296 p. ISBN 978-5-93255-522-4. (In Russ.).
15. Dutant J. The Legend of the Justified True Belief Analysis. Philosophical Perspectives. 2015. Vol. 29, no. 1. P. 95–145. DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12061. DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12061.
16. Gettier E. L. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis. 1963. Vol. 23, no. 6. P. 121–123. DOI: 10.1093/analys/23.6.121.
17. BonJour L. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1985. 272 p.
18. Goldman A. A Causal Theory of Knowing. Journal of Philosophy. 1967. Vol. 64, no. 12. P. 355–372. DOI: 10.2307/2024268.
19. Hintikka J. Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. New York: Cornell University Press, 1962. 179 p.
20. Nozick R. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1981. 784 p.
21. Williamson T. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 352 p.
22. Sartwell C. Why Knowledge Is Merely True Belief. Journal of Philosophy. 1992. Vol. 89, no. 4. P. 167–180. DOI: 10.2307/2026639.
23. Plato. Menon [Meno] / trans. from Anc. Greek by A. Osherov. Sobraniye sochineniy. V 4 t. [Collected Works. In 4 vols.]. Moscow, 1990. Vol. 1. P. 575–612. (In Russ.).
24. Woleński J. The History of Epistemology. Handbook of Epistemology / Eds. I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen, J. Woleński. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2004. P. 3–54.
25. Montmarquet J. Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility. Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield, 1993. 147 p.
26. Nagel T. Moral’naya udacha [Moral Luck] / trans. from Engl. by A. Chernyak. Logos. 2008. No. 1 (64). P. 174–187. EDN: TJIUIZ. (In Russ.).
27. Sylvan K. On the Autonomy of (Some) Knowledge. Analysis. 2023. Vol. 83, no. 4. P. 849–856. DOI: 10.1093/analys/anad083.
28. Heller M. The Proper Role for Contextualism in an Anti- Luck Epistemology. Nous. 1999. Vol. 33, no. s13. P. 115–129. DOI: 10.1111/0029-4624.33.s13.5.
29. Broncano-Berrocal F. Is Lucky Belief Justified? // Inquiry. 2023. [forthcoming]. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2023.2166984.
30. Kardash A. M. Protsessual’nyy relayabilizm i veriticheskaya rezul’tativnost’ [Process Reliabilism and Veritic Effectiveness]. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 2024. No. 3. P. 35–44. EDN: TYDWBX. (In Russ.).
31. Williamson T. Inexact Knowledge. Mind. 1992. Vol. 101, no. 402. P. 217–242. DOI: 10.1093/mind/101.402.217.
32. Foley R. The Theory of Epistemic Rationality. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. 344 p.
33. Goldman A. Strong and Weak Justification. Philosophical Perspectives.1988. Vol. 2. P. 51–69. DOI: 10.2307/2214068.
34. Pritchard D. The Value of Knowledge // The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 2009. Vol. 16, no. 1. P. 86–103. DOI: 10.5840/harvardreview20091616.
35. Ballantyne N. Does Luck Have a Place in Epistemology? Synthese. 2014. Vol. 191, no. 7. P. 1391–1407. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-013-0334-9.
Review
For citations:
Kardash A.M. Incidental knowledge defended. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2025;10(3):92-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-3-92-100. EDN: ZZJVZZ
Views:
7
JATS XML
Email this article 