Preview

Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity

Advanced search

Kantian Humility and Ontological Categories

S. Cowling

Translated from F.V. English Nekhaev, Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor Omsk State Technical University

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-1-91-96

EDN: KTFQLR

Abstract

Kant has a distinction between things in themselves and phenomena. Things as we know them consist ‘wholly of relations’ therefore we have no insight into ‘the inner’ of things. Kant says that we have no knowledge of the intrinsic properties of things. There are irremediable constraints on what we can know, inevitable limits on what we can become acquainted with. This is a kind of Epistemic Humility. It entails Categorical Humility, according to which we are just as irremediably ignorant of the categorical properties of entities. Ignorance of the categorical structure of the world creates two problems for defenders of Kantian Humility. First, if we know that Kantian  Humility  to be true, it must be false. Second, if Kantian  Humility is true, the argument for it cannot succeed.

About the Author

S. Cowling
University of Massachusetts
United States

Amherst



References

1. Langton R. Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998. 232 p. (In Engl.).

2. Lewis D. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986. 276 p. (In Engl.).

3. Dunn J. M. Relevant Predication 2: Intrinsic Properties and Internal Relations // Philosophical Studies. 1990. Vol. 60, no. 3. P. 177–206. DOI: 10.1007/BF00367469. (In Engl.).

4. Vallentyne P. Intrinsic Properties Defined // Philosophical Studies. 1997. Vol. 88, no. 2. P. 209–219. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004250930900. (In Engl.).

5. Sider T. Intrinsic Properties // Philosophical Studies. 1996. Vol. 83, no. 1. P. 1–27. DOI: 10.1007/BF00372433. (In Engl.).

6. Denby D. A. The Distinction Between Intrinsic and Extrinsic Properties // Mind. 2006. Vol. 115, no. 457. P. 1–17. DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzl001. (In Engl.).

7. Cowling S. Intrinsic Properties of Properties // The Philosophical Quarterly. 2017. Vol. 67, no. 267. P. 241–262. DOI: 10.1093/pq/pqw052. (In Engl.).

8. Harris R. A ‘Mere Cambridge’ Test to Demarcate Extrinsic from Intrinsic Properties // Acta Analytica. 2018. Vol. 33, no. 2. P. 199–225. DOI: 10.1007/s12136-017-0336-1. (In Engl.).

9. Lewis D. Extrinsic Properties // Philosophical Studies. 1983. Vol. 44, no. 2. P. 197–200. DOI: 10.1007/BF00354100. (In Engl.).


Review

For citations:


Cowling S. Kantian Humility and Ontological Categories. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2024;9(1):91-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-1-91-96. EDN: KTFQLR

Views: 7

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0488 (Print)
ISSN 2541-7983 (Online)