System-forming elements of scientific and technological development in industrial regions

The paper examines the theoretical and methodological aspects of the system-forming elements of scientific and technological development of industrial regions in the context of global scientific and technological challenges.
The methodological block of the research includes methods of comparison, synthesis, axiomatic, idealization, systematization, generalization, system analysis and balance. The research identifies the reproduction, organizational, process and territorial approaches among the methodological approaches.
The study of reproductive, organizational, process-based and territorial approaches concludes that relying on the methodological purposefulness of these frameworks, scientific and technological development can progress within the context of the established conditions features of industrial regions. The examination of the territorial and reproductive approaches reveal the advantages and disadvantages of each, enabling the proposal of a territorial-reproductive approach to scientific and technological development as well as the definition of its substance and key attributes.
The research elucidates the dynamism of scientific and technological development, substantiating its foundations, driving factors and outcomes. The authors argue that system-forming elements of scientific and technological development constitute the fundamental basis for the existence and dynamic functioning of a regional system. Industrial regions represent a potential sphere for the active application of these elements. System-forming elements allow reliably determining the vector orientation of an industrial region's scientific and technological development and obtaining monitoring-based assessments of results in both forecast and current timeframes.

1. Uzhegov A. O. Industrial profile of the regions and the possibilities of their high-tech development. Herald of Omsk

2. University. Series “Economics”. 2023;21(3):118–128. https:// doi.org/10.24147/1812-3988.2023.21(3).118-128. EDN: XTDSUQ. (In Russ.).

3. Risin I. E. The main directions, objectives and mechanisms spatial development of regions. REGION: Sistemy, Ekonomika, Upravleniye. 2019;2(45):25–30. (In Russ.).

4. Volkova N. N., Romanyuk E. I. Rating of scientific and technological development of the subjects of the Russian Federation // The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2023;2:50–72. https://doi. org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_2_50_72. EDN: QBNXNT. (In Russ.).

5. Kuznetsova O. V. Rating of scientific and technological development in regions: Approaches, results, and challenges. Studies on Russian Economic Development . 2023;4(199):94–103. https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-199-94-103. EDN: KLRQSG. (In Russ.).

6. Kozyr N. S. Russian spatial development strategy: Blind spots in regional specialisations. Vestnik Universiteta. 2022;1:43–49. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-1-43-49. EDN: BHWCRQ. (In Russ.).

7. Maksimenko D. D. Actual factors of high-tech production location in Russia. Regional Research. 2023;4(82):29–40. https:// doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2023-4-3. EDN: DLLAFD. (In Russ.).

8. Byvshev V. I., Pisarev I. V., Panteleeva I. A. Modern scientific and theoretical concepts of regional scientific, technological and innovation policy: research overview. Herald of Omsk University. Series “Economics”. 2024;22(4):94–104. https:// doi.org/10.24147/1812-3988.2024.22(4).94-104. EDN: EAJOSI. (In Russ.).

9. Semenov E. V. Public science and technology policy in modern Russia: idea and implementation. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2019;1(1):51–71. https://doi.org/10.19181/ smtp.2019.1.1.1. EDN: GETAMM. (In Russ.).

10. Akberdina V. V. Multifunctional role of industrially developed regions in the Russian economy. Journal of New Economy. 2020;3:48–72. https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-3-3. EDN: DKBDOE. (In Russ.).

11. Belyakov G. P., Bagdasaryan N. A. Scientific and technological development of the region as an object of strategic planning. Fundamental Research. 2021;12:60–67. https://doi.org/10.17513/ fr.43154. EDN: SSNBXP. (In Russ.).

12. Korovin G. B. Comparative Assessment of Digitalisation in Russian Industrial Regions. Ekonomika Regiona / Economy of Regions. 2023;19(1):60–74. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon. reg.2023-1-5. EDN: TZKGJT. (In Russ.).

13. Filippopoulos N., Fotopoulos G. Innovation in economically developed and lagging European regions: A configurational analysis. Research Policy. 2022;51(2):104424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104424. EDN: ZQQMKY.

14. Cowell M. Dealing with Deindustrialization: Adaptive Resilience in American Midwestern Regions. London: Routledge, 2014. 131 p.

15. Crafts N., Klein A. A long-run perspective on the spatial concentration of manufacturing industries in the United States. School of Economics Discussion Papers. 2017. No. 1715.

16. Korzovatykh Zh. M. System-forming elements of the digital economy. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2023;10-3:322–327. https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.3051. EDN: YIGTPU. (In Russ.).

17. Gartvich R. E. Monitoring regional economy: A composite indicator of economic activity in the Omsk region. Herald of Omsk University. Series “Economics”. 2024;22(4):105–114. https://doi. org/10.24147/1812-3988.2024.22(4).105-114. EDN: EZONHQ. (In Russ.).

18. Yashin S. N., Zakharova Yu. V. Analysis of regional disparities in innovative development and ways to overcome them. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2022;12(8):21352146. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.12.8.115130. EDN: EDLESJ. (In Russ.).

19. Artemova O. V. Directions and mechanisms for implementing the spatial development of industrial regions. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2020;10(444):50–61. https://doi. org/10.47475/1994-2796-2020-11006. EDN: ACZISP. (In Russ.).

20. Doussard M., Shrock G. Uneven decline: linking historical patterns and processes of industrial restructuring to future growth trajectories. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2015;8(2):149–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsv003.