sohimoОмский научный вестник. Серия "Общество. История. Современность"Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity2542-04882541-7983Омский государственный технический университет10.25206/2542-0488-2026-11-380-95LEIKZQsohimo-313Research ArticleФИЛОСОФИЯ. Позиции и А-ПозицииPHILOSOPHY. Pros and ConsЦифровые двойники и продление жизни: что по-настоящему важно? = Iglesias S., Earp B. D., Voinea C., Mann S. P., Zahiu A., Jecker N. S., Savulescu J. Digital Doppelgängers and Lifespan Extension: What Matters? / пер. с англ. А. В. АнтиповаDigital Doppelgängers and Lifespan Extension: What Matters? / trans. from Engl. A. V. AntipovИглесиасС.IglesiasS.

Оксфорд

ЙорпБ. Д.EarpB. D.

Оксфорд

ВойнеаК.VoineaC.

Оксфорд

МаннС. П.MannS. P.

Оксфорд

ЗахиуА.ZahiuA.

Бухарест

ДжекерН. С.JeckerN. S.

Вашингтон

СавулескуДж.SavulescuJ.

Оксфорд

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7048-3373АНТИПОВА. В.AntipovA. V.Информация о переводчике:

АНТИПОВ Алексей Владимирович, кандидат философских наук, старший научный сотрудник сектора гуманитарных экспертиз и биоэтики

г. Москва

AuthorID (РИНЦ): 828022

AuthorID (SCOPUS): 58117217900

Information about the translator:

ANTIPOV Aleksei Vladimirovich, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Humanitarian Expertise and Bioethics Department

Moscow.

AuthorID (RSCI): 828022

AuthorID (SCOPUS): 58117217900

ResearcherID: U-8814-2018

Оксфордский университетUnited KingdomБухарестский университетRomaniaВашингтонский университетUnited StatesИнститут философии Российской академии наукРоссияInstitute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation2026051020261138095Copyright © Иглесиас С., Йорп Б.Д., Войнеа К., Манн С.П., Захиу А., Джекер Н.С., Савулеску Д., АНТИПОВ А.В., 20262026Иглесиас С., Йорп Б.Д., Войнеа К., Манн С.П., Захиу А., Джекер Н.С., Савулеску Д., АНТИПОВ А.В.Iglesias S., Earp B.D., Voinea C., Mann S.P., Zahiu A., Jecker N.S., Savulescu J., Antipov A.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ois.omgtu.ru/jour/article/view/313

Продолжаются непрекращающиеся дискуссии об этике исследований в области продления жизни: в общих чертах, речь идет о применении медицинских технологий для увеличения биологической продолжительности человеческой жизни, за пределы существующего ‘естественного’ предела примерно в 120 лет. Одновременно наблюдается стремительный рост интереса к использованию искусственного интеллекта для создания ‘цифровых двойников’ людей, например, с помощью тонкой настройки больших языковых моделей на данных, относящихся к конкретным индивидам.

В работе мы исследуем вопрос о том, могут ли цифровые двойники (или, как мы их называем, цифровые доппельгангеры) стать путем к своего рода продлению жизни, или, точнее, продлению личности , которое не опирается на биологическую непрерывность. Мы рассматриваем соответствующие концепции сознания и тождества личности и доказываем, что цифровые доппельгангеры могут помочь нам достичь, по крайней мере, некоторых целей или предполагаемых благ, связанных с продлением существования личности, даже если они, согласно доминирующим философским подходам, не могут считаться буквальным продолжением нашей самости. Мы также принимаем во внимание реляционные концепции тождества личности и обсуждаем, каким образом цифровые доппельгангеры могут продлевать личность в реляционном смысле или сохранять некоторые блага, связанные с важными отношениями.

В заключение мы утверждаем, что исследовательская программа по изучению подобных вопросов актуальна для продолжающихся обсуждений об этике увеличения продолжительности человеческой жизни.

Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Goncharnaya St., 12, bld. 1, Moscow, 109240, Russia nelson02@yandex.ruThere is an ongoing debate about the ethics of research on lifespan extension: roughly, using medical technologies to extend biological human lives beyond the current ‘natural’ limit of about 120 years. At the same time, there is an exploding interest in the use of artificial intelligence to create ‘digital twins’ of persons, for example by fine-tuning large language models on data specific to particular individuals.In this paper, we consider whether digital twins (or digital doppelgängers, as we refer to them) could be a path toward a kind of life extension or more precisely, a kind of person extension that does not rely on biological continuity. We discuss relevant accounts of consciousness and personal identity and argue that digital doppelgängers may at least help us achieve some of the aims or ostensible goods of personspan extension, even if they may not count as literal extensions of our personhood on dominant philosophical accounts. We also consider relational accounts of personhood and discuss how digital doppelgängers may be able to extend personhood in a relational sense, or at least secure some of the goods associated with relevant relationships.We conclude by suggesting that a research program to investigate such issues is relevant to ongoing debates about the ethics of extending the human lifespan.

старениецифровые двойникицифровые близнецыпродление жизниисследования долголетияискусственный интеллектagingdigital duplicatesdigital twinslife extensionlongevity researchArtificial IntelligenceReferencesSchloendorn J. Making the Case for Human Life Extension: Personal Arguments. Bioethics. 2006;20(4):191–202. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00494.x.Schloendorn J. Making the Case for Human Life Extension: Personal Arguments. Bioethics. 2006;20(4):191–202. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00494.x.Davis J. New Methuselahs: The Ethics of Life Extension. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2018. 368 p.Davis J. New Methuselahs: The Ethics of Life Extension. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2018. 368 p.Porter A. Arguments Over Life Extension in Contemporary Bioethics. Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Vol. I / Eds. E. Valdйs, J. A. Lecaros. Cham: Springer, 2023. P. 247–276.Porter A. Arguments Over Life Extension in Contemporary Bioethics. Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Vol. I / Eds. E. Valdйs, J. A. Lecaros. Cham: Springer, 2023. P. 247–276.Lucke J. C., Hall W. Strong and Weak Lifespan Extension: What Is Most Feasible and Likely? Australasian Journal on Ageing. 2006;25(2):58–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17416612.2006.00150.x.Lucke J. C., Hall W. Strong and Weak Lifespan Extension: What Is Most Feasible and Likely? Australasian Journal on Ageing. 2006;25(2):58–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17416612.2006.00150.x.Porsdam Mann S., Earp B. D., Møller N. [et al.]. AUTOGEN: A Personalized Large Language Model for AcademicPorsdam Mann S., Earp B. D., Møller N. [et al.]. AUTOGEN: A Personalized Large Language Model for AcademicEnhancement Ethics and Proof of Principle. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2023;23(10):28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15265161.2023.2233356.Enhancement Ethics and Proof of Principle. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2023;23(10):28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15265161.2023.2233356.Danaher J., Nyholm S. The Ethics of Personalised Digital Duplicates: A Minimally Viable Permissibility Principle. AI and Ethics. 2025;5(2):1703–1718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-02400513-7.Danaher J., Nyholm S. The Ethics of Personalised Digital Duplicates: A Minimally Viable Permissibility Principle. AI and Ethics. 2025;5(2):1703–1718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-02400513-7.Danaher J., Nyholm S. Digital Duplicates and the Scarcity Problem: Might AI Make Us Less Scarce and Therefore Less Valuable? Philosophy & Technology. 2024;37:106. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13347-024-00795-z.Danaher J., Nyholm S. Digital Duplicates and the Scarcity Problem: Might AI Make Us Less Scarce and Therefore Less Valuable? Philosophy & Technology. 2024;37:106. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13347-024-00795-z.Steinhart E. Survival as a Digital Ghost. Minds and Machines. 2007;17:261–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-0079068-0.Steinhart E. Survival as a Digital Ghost. Minds and Machines. 2007;17:261–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-0079068-0.Caon M. Designing Systems for the Digital Immortality of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2019). Nice: Springer International Publishing, 2020. P. 783–789.Caon M. Designing Systems for the Digital Immortality of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2019). Nice: Springer International Publishing, 2020. P. 783–789.Voinea C. On Grief and Griefbots. Think . 2024;23(67):4751. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477175623000490.Voinea C. On Grief and Griefbots. Think . 2024;23(67):4751. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477175623000490.Voinea C., Porsdam Mann S., Savulescu J., Earp B. D. Digital Doppelgängers, Human Relationships, and Practical Identity. Bioethics. 2026;40(5):435–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/ bioe.70026.Voinea C., Porsdam Mann S., Savulescu J., Earp B. D. Digital Doppelgängers, Human Relationships, and Practical Identity. Bioethics. 2026;40(5):435–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/ bioe.70026.Hicks M. T., Humphries J., Slater J. ChatGPT Is Bullshit. Ethics and Information Technology. 2024;26:38. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5.Hicks M. T., Humphries J., Slater J. ChatGPT Is Bullshit. Ethics and Information Technology. 2024;26:38. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5.Porsdam Mann S., Earp B. D., Mшller N. [et al.]. AUTOGEN and the Ethics of Co-Creation with Personalized LLMs Reply to the Commentaries. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2024;24(3):W6–W14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1526516 1.2024.2308175.Porsdam Mann S., Earp B. D., Mшller N. [et al.]. AUTOGEN and the Ethics of Co-Creation with Personalized LLMs Reply to the Commentaries. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2024;24(3):W6–W14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1526516 1.2024.2308175.Earp B. D., Porsdam Mann S., Liu P. [et al.]. Credit and Blame for AI-Generated Content: Effects of Personalization in Four Countries. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2024;1542(1):51–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15258.Earp B. D., Porsdam Mann S., Liu P. [et al.]. Credit and Blame for AI-Generated Content: Effects of Personalization in Four Countries. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2024;1542(1):51–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15258.Masood M., Nawaz M., Malik K. M. [et al.]. Deepfakes Generation and Detection: State-of-the-Art, Open Challenges, Countermeasures, and Way Forward. Applied Intelligence. 2023;53:3974–4026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-02203766-z.Masood M., Nawaz M., Malik K. M. [et al.]. Deepfakes Generation and Detection: State-of-the-Art, Open Challenges, Countermeasures, and Way Forward. Applied Intelligence. 2023;53:3974–4026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-02203766-z.Sterri A., Earp B. D. The Ethics of Sex Robots. Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics / Ed. C. Véliz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. P. 241–257.Sterri A., Earp B. D. The Ethics of Sex Robots. Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics / Ed. C. Véliz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. P. 241–257.Morris M. R., Brubaker J. R. Generative Ghosts: Anticipating Benefits and Risks of AI Afterlives. arXiv preprint. 2024. arXiv:2402.01662. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01662. (accessed: 04.09.2025).Morris M. R., Brubaker J. R. Generative Ghosts: Anticipating Benefits and Risks of AI Afterlives. arXiv preprint. 2024. arXiv:2402.01662. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01662. (accessed: 04.09.2025).Replika. 2024. URL: https://replika.com/ (accessed: 04.09.2025).Replika. 2024. URL: https://replika.com/ (accessed: 04.09.2025).YOV Home | You, Only Virtual. 2024. URL: https://www. myyov.com/ (accessed: 04.09.2025).YOV Home | You, Only Virtual. 2024. URL: https://www. myyov.com/ (accessed: 04.09.2025).Holley P. Hey, Google! Let Me Talk to My Departed Father. Washington Post . 2019. August 29. URL: https://www. washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/08/29/hey-google-let-metalk-my-departed-father/ (accessed: 04.09.2025).Holley P. Hey, Google! Let Me Talk to My Departed Father. Washington Post . 2019. August 29. URL: https://www. washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/08/29/hey-google-let-metalk-my-departed-father/ (accessed: 04.09.2025).Chesler C. AI’s New Frontier: Connecting Grieving Loved Ones with the Deceased. Washington Post. 2022. November 12. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/11/12/ artificial-intelligence-grief/ (accessed: 04.09.2025).Chesler C. AI’s New Frontier: Connecting Grieving Loved Ones with the Deceased. Washington Post. 2022. November 12. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/11/12/ artificial-intelligence-grief/ (accessed: 04.09.2025).Bubeck S., Chandrasekaran V., Eldan R. [et al.]. Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4. arXiv preprint. 2023. arXiv: 2303.12712. URL: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2303.12712. (accessed: 04.09.2025).Bubeck S., Chandrasekaran V., Eldan R. [et al.]. Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4. arXiv preprint. 2023. arXiv: 2303.12712. URL: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2303.12712. (accessed: 04.09.2025).Bucher M. J. J., Martini M. Fine-Tuned ‘Small’ LLMs (Still) Significantly Outperform Zero-Shot Generative AI Models in Text Classification. arXiv preprint. 2024. arXiv: 2406.08660. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08660 (accessed: 93 04.09.2025).Bucher M. J. J., Martini M. Fine-Tuned ‘Small’ LLMs (Still) Significantly Outperform Zero-Shot Generative AI Models in Text Classification. arXiv preprint. 2024. arXiv: 2406.08660. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08660 (accessed: 93 04.09.2025).Vaid A., Landi I., Nadkarni G., Nabeel I. Using Fine-Tuned Large Language Models to Parse Clinical Notes in Musculoskeletal Pain Disorders. The Lancet Digital Health. 2023;5(12):e855–e858. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00202-9.Vaid A., Landi I., Nadkarni G., Nabeel I. Using Fine-Tuned Large Language Models to Parse Clinical Notes in Musculoskeletal Pain Disorders. The Lancet Digital Health. 2023;5(12):e855–e858. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00202-9.Lewis P., Perez E., Piktus A. [et al.]. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020 / Eds. H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.-F. Balcan, H.-T. Lin. P. 9459–9474. https://doi.org/10.5555/3495724.3496517.Lewis P., Perez E., Piktus A. [et al.]. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020 / Eds. H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.-F. Balcan, H.-T. Lin. P. 9459–9474. https://doi.org/10.5555/3495724.3496517.Zohny H., Porsdam Mann S., Earp B. D., McMillan J. Generative AI and Medical Ethics: The State of Play. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2024;50:75–76. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme2023-109834.Zohny H., Porsdam Mann S., Earp B. D., McMillan J. Generative AI and Medical Ethics: The State of Play. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2024;50:75–76. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme2023-109834.Schwitzgebel E., Schwitzgebel D., Strasser A. Creating a Large Language Model of a Philosopher. Mind & Language. 2024;39(2):237–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12466.Schwitzgebel E., Schwitzgebel D., Strasser A. Creating a Large Language Model of a Philosopher. Mind & Language. 2024;39(2):237–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12466.Earp B. D., Porsdam Mann S., Allen J. [et al.]. A Personalized Patient Preference Predictor for Substituted Judgments in Healthcare: Technically Feasible and Ethically Desirable. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2024;24(7):13–26. https://doi. org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2296402.Earp B. D., Porsdam Mann S., Allen J. [et al.]. A Personalized Patient Preference Predictor for Substituted Judgments in Healthcare: Technically Feasible and Ethically Desirable. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2024;24(7):13–26. https://doi. org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2296402.Armstrong K. ChatGPT: US Lawyer Admits Using AI for Case Research. BBC News. 2023. URL: https://www.bbc.com/ news/world-us-canada-65735769 (accessed: 04.09.2024).Armstrong K. ChatGPT: US Lawyer Admits Using AI for Case Research. BBC News. 2023. URL: https://www.bbc.com/ news/world-us-canada-65735769 (accessed: 04.09.2024).Eaton K. How Many R’s in ‘Strawberry’? This AI Doesn’t Know. Inc . 2024. URL: https://www.inc.com/kit-eaton/howmany-rs-in-strawberry-this-ai-cant-tell-you.html (accessed: 04.09. 2025).Eaton K. How Many R’s in ‘Strawberry’? This AI Doesn’t Know. Inc . 2024. URL: https://www.inc.com/kit-eaton/howmany-rs-in-strawberry-this-ai-cant-tell-you.html (accessed: 04.09. 2025).Chelli M., Descamps J., Lavoué V. [et al.]. Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2024;26:e53164. https://doi.org/10.2196/53164.Chelli M., Descamps J., Lavoué V. [et al.]. Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2024;26:e53164. https://doi.org/10.2196/53164.Sui P., Duede E., Wu S., So R. Confabulation: The Surprising Value of Large Language Model Hallucinations. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Vol. 1: Long Papers / Eds. L. Ku, A. Martins, V. Srikumar. Bangkok: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024. P. 14274–14284.Sui P., Duede E., Wu S., So R. Confabulation: The Surprising Value of Large Language Model Hallucinations. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Vol. 1: Long Papers / Eds. L. Ku, A. Martins, V. Srikumar. Bangkok: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024. P. 14274–14284.Jiang X., Tian Y., Hua Y. F. [et al.]. A Survey on Large Language Model Hallucination via a Creativity Perspective. arXiv preprint. 2024. arXiv:2402.06647. URL: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2402.06647 (accessed: 04.09.2025).Jiang X., Tian Y., Hua Y. F. [et al.]. A Survey on Large Language Model Hallucination via a Creativity Perspective. arXiv preprint. 2024. arXiv:2402.06647. URL: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2402.06647 (accessed: 04.09.2025).Chalmers D. J. Could a Large Language Model Be Conscious? arXiv preprint. 2023. arXiv:2303.07103. URL: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2303.07103 (accessed: 04.09.2025).Chalmers D. J. Could a Large Language Model Be Conscious? arXiv preprint. 2023. arXiv:2303.07103. URL: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2303.07103 (accessed: 04.09.2025).Schechter E. Intentions and Unified Agency: Insights from the Split-Brain Phenomenon. Mind & Language. 2012;27(5):570594. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12003.Schechter E. Intentions and Unified Agency: Insights from the Split-Brain Phenomenon. Mind & Language. 2012;27(5):570594. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12003.Baars B. J. Global Workspace Theory of Consciousness: Toward a Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Experience. The Boundaries of Consciousness: Neurobiology and Neuropathology / Ed. S. Laureys. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005. P. 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50004-9. 37. Dodig-Crnkovic G. How GPT Realizes Leibniz’s Dream and Passes the Turing Test without Being Conscious. Computer Sciences & Mathematics Forum. 2023;8(1):66. https://doi. org/10.3390/cmsf2023008066.Baars B. J. Global Workspace Theory of Consciousness: Toward a Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Experience. The Boundaries of Consciousness: Neurobiology and Neuropathology / Ed. S. Laureys. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005. P. 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50004-9. 37. Dodig-Crnkovic G. How GPT Realizes Leibniz’s Dream and Passes the Turing Test without Being Conscious. Computer Sciences & Mathematics Forum. 2023;8(1):66. https://doi. org/10.3390/cmsf2023008066.Bender E. M., Gebru T., McMillan-Major A., Shmitchell S. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? FAccT’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021. P. 610–623. https://doi. org/10.1145/3442188.3445922.Bender E. M., Gebru T., McMillan-Major A., Shmitchell S. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? FAccT’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021. P. 610–623. https://doi. org/10.1145/3442188.3445922.Long R., Sebo J., Butlin P. [et al.]. Taking AI Welfare Seriously. arXiv preprint. 2024. arXiv:2411.00986. URL: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2411.00986 (accessed: 04.09.2025).Long R., Sebo J., Butlin P. [et al.]. Taking AI Welfare Seriously. arXiv preprint. 2024. arXiv:2411.00986. URL: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2411.00986 (accessed: 04.09.2025).Searle J. Biological Naturalism. The Blackwell Companion 94 to Consciousness / Eds. M. Velmans, S. Schneider. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007. P. 325–334.Searle J. Biological Naturalism. The Blackwell Companion 94 to Consciousness / Eds. M. Velmans, S. Schneider. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007. P. 325–334.Lloyd D. What Is It Like to Be a Bot? The World According to GPT-4. Frontiers in Psychology . 2024;15:1292675. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1292675.Lloyd D. What Is It Like to Be a Bot? The World According to GPT-4. Frontiers in Psychology . 2024;15:1292675. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1292675.Block N. Consciousness, Accessibility, and the Mesh Between Psychology and Neuroscience. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2007;30(5-6):481–499. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0140525X07002786.Block N. Consciousness, Accessibility, and the Mesh Between Psychology and Neuroscience. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2007;30(5-6):481–499. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0140525X07002786.Naccache L. Why and How Access Consciousness Can Account for Phenomenal Consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2018;373(1755):20170357. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0357.Naccache L. Why and How Access Consciousness Can Account for Phenomenal Consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2018;373(1755):20170357. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0357.Bird-David N., Israeli T. A Moment Dead, a Moment Alive: How a Situational Personhood Emerges in the Vegetative State in an Israeli Hospital Unit. American Anthropologist. 2010;112:5465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01196.x.Bird-David N., Israeli T. A Moment Dead, a Moment Alive: How a Situational Personhood Emerges in the Vegetative State in an Israeli Hospital Unit. American Anthropologist. 2010;112:5465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01196.x.McInerney P. K. Person-Stages and Unity of Consciousness. American Philosophical Quarterly. 1985; 22(3):197–209.McInerney P. K. Person-Stages and Unity of Consciousness. American Philosophical Quarterly. 1985; 22(3):197–209.Blumenthal-Barby J. The End of Personhood. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2024;24(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15 265161.2022.2160515.Blumenthal-Barby J. The End of Personhood. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2024;24(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15 265161.2022.2160515.Dranseika V., Neiders I., Earp B. D. Time for Bioethics to End Talk of Personhood (But Only in the Philosophers’ Sense). The American Journal of Bioethics . 2024;24(1):32–35. https://doi. org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2278567.Dranseika V., Neiders I., Earp B. D. Time for Bioethics to End Talk of Personhood (But Only in the Philosophers’ Sense). The American Journal of Bioethics . 2024;24(1):32–35. https://doi. org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2278567.Koplin J., Holzman T., Bhatia N., Savulescu J. Bioethics Should Not Be Constrained by Linguistic Oddness or Social Offense. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2024;24(1):15–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2279435.Koplin J., Holzman T., Bhatia N., Savulescu J. Bioethics Should Not Be Constrained by Linguistic Oddness or Social Offense. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2024;24(1):15–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2279435.Parfit D. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984. 560 p.Parfit D. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984. 560 p.McMahan J. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 560 p.McMahan J. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 560 p.Voinea C., Porsdam Mann S., Register C. [et al.]. Digital Duplicates, Scarcity, and Value: Commentary on Danaher and Nyholm (2024). Philosophy & Technology. 2024;37:121. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13347-024-00813-0.Voinea C., Porsdam Mann S., Register C. [et al.]. Digital Duplicates, Scarcity, and Value: Commentary on Danaher and Nyholm (2024). Philosophy & Technology. 2024;37:121. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13347-024-00813-0.Nagel T. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review. 1974;83(4):435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914.Nagel T. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review. 1974;83(4):435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914.Partridge E. Posthumous Interests and Posthumous Respect. Ethics. 1981;91(2):243–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/292226.Partridge E. Posthumous Interests and Posthumous Respect. Ethics. 1981;91(2):243–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/292226.Harris J. Doing Posthumous Harm. The Metaphysics and Ethics of Death: New Essays / Ed. J. S. Taylor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 213–221.Harris J. Doing Posthumous Harm. The Metaphysics and Ethics of Death: New Essays / Ed. J. S. Taylor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 213–221.Pitcher G. The Misfortunes of the Dead. American Philosophical Quarterly . 1984;21(2):183–188.Pitcher G. The Misfortunes of the Dead. American Philosophical Quarterly . 1984;21(2):183–188.Feinberg J. The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations. Environmental Rights / Ed. S. Vanderheiden. New York: Routledge, 2017. P. 241–265.Feinberg J. The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations. Environmental Rights / Ed. S. Vanderheiden. New York: Routledge, 2017. P. 241–265.Boonin D. Dead Wrong: The Ethics of Posthumous Harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. 222 p.Boonin D. Dead Wrong: The Ethics of Posthumous Harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. 222 p.Birren J. E. A Contribution to the Theory of the Psychology of Aging: As a Counterpart of Development. Emergent Theories of Aging / Eds. J. E. Birren, V. L. Bengtson. New York: Springer, 1988. P. 153–176.Birren J. E. A Contribution to the Theory of the Psychology of Aging: As a Counterpart of Development. Emergent Theories of Aging / Eds. J. E. Birren, V. L. Bengtson. New York: Springer, 1988. P. 153–176.Kotre J. N. Outliving the Self: How We Live on in Future Generations. New York: W W. Norton & Co., 1984. 282 p.Kotre J. N. Outliving the Self: How We Live on in Future Generations. New York: W W. Norton & Co., 1984. 282 p.Rozin P., Stellar J. Posthumous Events Affect Rated Quality and Happiness of Lives. Judgment and Decision Making. 2009;4(4):273–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500003843.Rozin P., Stellar J. Posthumous Events Affect Rated Quality and Happiness of Lives. Judgment and Decision Making. 2009;4(4):273–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500003843.Scarre G. On Caring about One’s Posthumous Reputation. American Philosophical Quarterly. 2001;38(2):209–219.Scarre G. On Caring about One’s Posthumous Reputation. American Philosophical Quarterly. 2001;38(2):209–219.Hunter E. G. Beyond Death: Inheriting the Past and Giving to the Future, Transmitting the Legacy of One’s Self. OMEGA Journal of Death and Dying. 2008;56(4):313–329. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.56.4.a.Hunter E. G. Beyond Death: Inheriting the Past and Giving to the Future, Transmitting the Legacy of One’s Self. OMEGA Journal of Death and Dying. 2008;56(4):313–329. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.56.4.a.Zacher H., Rosing K., Frese M. Age and Leadership: The Moderating Role of Legacy Beliefs. The Leadership Quarterly. 2011;22(1):43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.006.Zacher H., Rosing K., Frese M. Age and Leadership: The Moderating Role of Legacy Beliefs. The Leadership Quarterly. 2011;22(1):43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.006.Barnes D. B., Taylor-Brown S., Wiener L. “I Didn’t Leave Y’all on Purpose”: HIV-Infected Mothers’ Videotaped Legacies forBarnes D. B., Taylor-Brown S., Wiener L. “I Didn’t Leave Y’all on Purpose”: HIV-Infected Mothers’ Videotaped Legacies forTheir Children. Qualitative Sociology . 1997;20:7–32. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1024760113945.Their Children. Qualitative Sociology . 1997;20:7–32. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1024760113945.Andersen S. M., Chen S. The Relational Self: An Interpersonal Social-Cognitive Theory. Psychological Review. 2002;109(4):619645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.619.Andersen S. M., Chen S. The Relational Self: An Interpersonal Social-Cognitive Theory. Psychological Review. 2002;109(4):619645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.619.Abdel-Khalek A. M. Why Do We Fear Death? The Construction and Validation of the Reasons for Death Fear Scale. Death Studies. 2002;26(8):669–680. https://doi. org/10.1080/07481180290088365.Abdel-Khalek A. M. Why Do We Fear Death? The Construction and Validation of the Reasons for Death Fear Scale. Death Studies. 2002;26(8):669–680. https://doi. org/10.1080/07481180290088365.Cicirelli V. G. Personal Meanings of Death in Relation to Fear of Death. Death Studies. 1998;22(8):713–733. https://doi. org/10.1080/074811898201236.Cicirelli V. G. Personal Meanings of Death in Relation to Fear of Death. Death Studies. 1998;22(8):713–733. https://doi. org/10.1080/074811898201236.Bath D. M. Separation from Loved Ones in the Fear of Death. Death Studies. 2010;34(5):404–425. https://doi. org/10.1080/07481181003697639.Bath D. M. Separation from Loved Ones in the Fear of Death. Death Studies. 2010;34(5):404–425. https://doi. org/10.1080/07481181003697639.Taylor C. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989. 601 p. (Гарвардское университетское издательство (Harvard University Press) внесено в реестр нежелательных организаций на территории Российской Федерации).Taylor C. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989. 601 p. (Гарвардское университетское издательство (Harvard University Press) внесено в реестр нежелательных организаций на территории Российской Федерации).Lindemann H. Holding and Letting Go: The Social Practice of Personal Identities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 220 p.Lindemann H. Holding and Letting Go: The Social Practice of Personal Identities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 220 p.Iftode C., Zorilă A., Vică C., Mihailov E. Experimental and Relational Authenticity: How Neurotechnologies Impact Narrative Identities. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2024;23:743–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09825-7.Iftode C., Zorilă A., Vică C., Mihailov E. Experimental and Relational Authenticity: How Neurotechnologies Impact Narrative Identities. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2024;23:743–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09825-7.Velleman J. D. Self to Self: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 385 p.Velleman J. D. Self to Self: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 385 p.Turkle S. Authenticity in the Age of Digital Companions. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems . 2007;8(3):501–517. https://doi. org/10.1075/is.8.3.11tur.Turkle S. Authenticity in the Age of Digital Companions. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems . 2007;8(3):501–517. https://doi. org/10.1075/is.8.3.11tur.Callahan D. Setting Limits: Medical Goals in an Aging Society with “A Response to My Critics”. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1995. 256 p.Callahan D. Setting Limits: Medical Goals in an Aging Society with “A Response to My Critics”. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1995. 256 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.