sohimoОмский научный вестник. Серия "Общество. История. Современность"Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity2542-04882541-7983Омский государственный технический университет10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-3-60-66RBMMRXsohimo-180Research ArticleФИЛОСОФИЯЛибертарианская модель культурного консерватизмаLibertarian model of cultural conservatismhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1241-5409ПарфеновА. Д.ParfenovA. D.

ПАРФЕНОВ Александр Дмитриевич, аспирант, ассистент кафедры философии

г. Тюмень.

PARFENOV Alexander Dmitrievich, Graduate Student,Assistant of Philosophy Department

Tyumen

forlanatletico@mail.ruТюменский государственный университетTyumen State University202330092023836066Copyright © Парфенов А.Д., 20232023Парфенов А.Д.Parfenov A.D.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ois.omgtu.ru/jour/article/view/180

В статье представлен анализ теорий и подходов к обоснованию синтеза либертарианской политической философии и культурного консерватизма. В исторической перспективе показан генезис основных концепций и методов, лежащих в основании исследуемых теорий. Делается акцент на аргументах и доводах, представленных сторонниками данной политико-философской модели. Основная цель статьи — выявить особенности обоснования либертарианско-консервативного синтеза, а также основные достоинства и недостатки предлагаемых аргументов. 

The article presents an analysis of theories and approaches to substantiate the synthesis of libertarian political philosophy and cultural conservatism. In a historical perspective, the genesis of the main concepts and methods underlying the theories under study is shown. Emphasis is placed on the arguments and arguments presented by the supporters of this political and philosophical model. The main purpose of the article is to identify the features of the substantiation of the libertarian-conservative synthesis, as well as the main advantages and disadvantages of the proposed arguments. 

культурный консерватизмконсерватизмлибертарианствополитическая философияcultural conservatismconservatismlibertarianismpolitical philosophyReferencesHunter J. D. Culture Wars: The Struggles to Define America. New York: Basic Books, 1991. 432 p.Hunter J. D. Culture Wars: The Struggles to Define America. New York: Basic Books, 1991. (In Engl.).Thomson I. T. Culture Wars and Enduring American Dilemmas. University of Michigan Press, 2010. Ch. 1. p. 1–30. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt22p7hg8.3.Thomson I. T. Culture Wars and Enduring American Dilemmas. University of Michigan Press, 2010. Ch.1. p. 1–30. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt22p7hg8.3. (In Engl.).Kirk R. Libertarians: the chirping sectaries // Modern Age. 1981. Vol. 25, № 4. P. 345–351.Kirk R. Libertarians: the chirping sectaries // Modern Age. 1981 Vol. 25, no. 4. P. 345–351. (In Engl.).Scruton R. Conservatism. An Invitation to the Great Tradition. St. Martin Press, 2018. 176 p. ISBN 9781250170569.Scruton R. Conservatism. An Invitation to the Great Tradition. St. Martin Press, 2018. 176 p. ISBN 9781250170569. (In Engl.).Скрутон Р. Как быть консерватором / пер. с англ. Б. Дынина. Москва, 2021. 211 с.Scruton R. Kak byt’ konservatorom [How to be a conservative] / trans. by Engl. B. Dynin, 2021. 211 p. (In Russ.).Hoppe H.-H. Democracy. The God That Failed. The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2007. 304 p.Hoppe H.-H. Democracy. The God That Failed. The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2007. 304 p. (In Engl.).Хайек Ф. А. Индивидуализм и экономический порядок / пер. с англ. О. А. Дмитриевой; под ред. Р. И. Капелюшникова. Челябинск: Социум, 2011. Гл. I. C. 1–40.Hayek F. A. Individualism i estestvenny poryadok [Individualism and economic order] / trans. by Engl. O. A. Dmitrieva, ed. R. I. Kapelyushnikova. Chelyabinsk, 2011. Ch. I. P. 1–40. (In Russ.).Мизес Л. фон. Социализм. Экономический и социологический анализ. Москва: Catallaxy, 1994. 416 с.Mises L. von. Socialism. Economichesky i socialny analiz [Socialism. Economic and sociological analysis]. Moscow, 1994. 416 p. (In Russ.).Tucker J. A., Rockwell L. H. The Cultural Thought of Ludwig von Mises // The Journal of Libertarian studies. 1995. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 23–52.Tucker J. A., Rockwell L. H. The Cultural Thought of Ludwig von Mises // The Journal of Libertarian studies. 1991. Vol. 10, no. 1. P. 23–52. (In Engl.).Meyer F. In Defense of Freedom: A Conservative Credo. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1962. 179 p.Meyer F. In Defense of Freedom: A Conservative Credo. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1962. 179 p. (In Engl.).Bozell L. B. Freedom or Virtue? // Freedom and Virtue. The Conservative/Libertarian Debate / Ed. G. W. Carey. Revised, updated ed. Wilmington, Delaware: Intercollegiate Studies Institute. 1998. P. 23–37.Bozell L. B. Freedom or Virtue? // Freedom and Virtue. The Conservative/Libertarian Debate / Ed. G. W. Carey. Revised, updated ed. Wilmington, Delaware: Intercollegiate Studies Institute. 1998. P. 23–37. (In Engl.).Raico R. Is libertarian amoral? // Mises Institute. 2019. URL: https://mises.org/library/libertarianism-amoral (дата обращения: 01.03.2023).Raico R. Is libertarian immoral? // Mises Institute. 2019. URL: https://mises.org/library/libertarianism-amoral (accessed: 03.01.2023). (In Engl.).Rothbard M. N. Frank S. Meyer: the fusionist as libertarian Manque // Modern Age.1981. Vol. 25, № 4. P. 352– 363.Rothbard M. N. Frank S. Meyer: the fusionist as libertarian Manque // Modern Age. Vol. 25, no. 4. 1981. P. 352–363. (In Engl.).Rothbard M. N. Egalitarism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2000. P. 1–21. ISBN 0-945466-23-4.Rothbard M. N. Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2000. P. 1–21. ISBN 0-945466-23-4. (In Engl.).Chmielowski M. Murray N. Rothbard’s paleolibertarianism. In search for a political success during the Republican party presidential primaries 1992 // Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas. 2016. Vol. 19, № 2. P. 371–387.Chmielowski M. Murray N. Rothbard’s paleolibertarianism. In search for a political success during the Republican party presidential primaries 1992 // Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Politicas. 2016. Vol. 19, no. 2. P. 371–387. (In Engl.).Rockwell L. The Case for Paleo-libertarianism // Liberty. 1990. Vol. 3, № 3. P. 34–38.Rockwell L. The Case for Paleo-libertarianism // Liberty. 1990. Vol. 3, no. 3. P. 34–38. (In Engl.).Rothbard M. N., Rockwell L. Why the Report? // Rothbard-Rockwell Report, April 1990.Rothbard M. N., Rockwell L. Why the Report? // Rothbard-Rockwell Report, April 1990. (In Engl.).Rothbard M. N. Why Paleo? // Rothbard-Rockwell Report, May 1990.Rothbard M. N. Why Paleo? // Rothbard-Rockwell Report, May 1990. (In Engl.).Block W. Plumb-Line Libertarianism: a Critique of Hoppe // Reason Papers. 2007. Vol. 29. P. 151–163.Block W. Plumb-Line Libertarianism: a Critique of Hoppe // Reason Papers. 2007. Vol. 29. P. 151–163. (In Engl.).Хоппе Х.-Х. Понимая либертарианство правильно / пер. с англ. Парфенюк. Москва: Библиотека Шевцова, 2018. 129 с.Hoppe H.-H. Ponimaya libertarianstvo pravil’no [Understanding libertarianism correctly] / trans. by Engl. M. Parfenyuk. Moscow, 2018. 129 p. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.