<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sohimo</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Омский научный вестник. Серия "Общество. История. Современность"</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2542-0488</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-7983</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Омский государственный технический университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-1-75-84</article-id><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">YCRJNV</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sohimo-120</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ФИЛОСОФИЯ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Коммунитарные модели культурного консерватизма</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Communitarian Models of Cultural Conservatism</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1241-5409</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Парфенов</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Parfenov</surname><given-names>A. D.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Парфенов Александр Дмитриевич, аспирант, ассистент кафедры философии, медиа и журналистики </p><p>Тюмень</p><p>AuthorID (РИНЦ): 1141812</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Parfenov Alexander Dmitrievich, Graduate Student, Assistant of Philosophy, Media and Journalism Department</p><p>Tyumen</p><p>AuthorID (RSCI): 1141812</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">forlanatletico@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Тюменский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Tyumen State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>84</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Парфенов А.А., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Парфенов А.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Parfenov A.D.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ois.omgtu.ru/jour/article/view/120">https://ois.omgtu.ru/jour/article/view/120</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье анализируются коммунитарные модели культурного консерватизма. Выявляются специфические черты культурного консерватизма как формы консервативной теории. Проводится сравнительный анализ различных коммунитарных моделей   культурного   консерватизма, выявляются их общие и специфические черты. Делается вывод о том, что исходные коммунитарные принципы культурных консерваторов могут приводить к разным оценкам роли государства в проведении культурной и национальной политики, а также наиболее предпочтительных способов защиты и сохранения ценностей.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article analyses communitarian models of cultural conservatism. The specific features of cultural conservatism as a form of conservative theory are revealed. A comparative analysis of various communitarian models for cultural conservatism is carried out, their common and specific features are identified. It is concluded that the initial communitarian principles of cultural conservatives can lead to different assessments of the role of the state in the implementation of cultural and national policies, as well as the most preferable ways of protecting and preserving values.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>консерватизм</kwd><kwd>культурный консерватизм</kwd><kwd>культурная политика</kwd><kwd>коммунитаризм</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>conservatism</kwd><kwd>cultural conservatism</kwd><kwd>cultural policy</kwd><kwd>communitarianism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oakeshott M. On Being Conservative // Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991. P. 407–437.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oakeshott M. On Being Conservative // Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991. P. 407–437. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хантингтон С. Консерватизм как идеология / пер. с англ. А. Закутина // Тетради по консерватизму. 2016. № 1. С. 231–250. DOI: 10.24030/2409-2517-2016-1-231-250.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huntington S. Konservatizm kak ideologiya [Conservatism as an Ideology] / trans. from Engl. A. Zakutin // Tetradi po konservatizmu. Notebooks on Conservatism. 2016. No. 1. P. 231– 250. DOI: 10.24030/2409-2517-2016-1-231-250. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ремизов М. В. Консерватизм как стиль мышления и политическая повестка // Тетради по консерватизму. 2014. № 1. С. 79–83.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Remizov M. V. Konservatizm kak stil’ myshleniya i politicheskaya povestka [Conservatism as a Style of Thinking and Political Agenda] // Tetradi po konservatizmu. Notebooks on Conservatism. 2014. No. 1. P. 79–83. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ремизов М. В. Миссия консерватизма в современном мире // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. 2010. № 4. С. 97–106.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Remizov M. V. Missiya konservatizma v sovremennom mire [The Mission of Conservatism in the Modern World] // Kontury global’nykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo. Contours of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. 2010. No. 4. P. 97–106. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мангейм К. Идеология и утопия / пер. с нем. М. Левиной // Утопия и утопическое мышление. Антология зарубежной литературы. Москва: Прогресс, 1991. С. 113–169.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mannheim K. Ideologiya i utopiya [Ideology and Utopia] / transl. by Germ. M. Levinoy // Utopiya i utopicheskoye myshleniye. Antologiya zarubezhnoy literatury. [Utopia and Utopian Thinking. Anthology of Foreign Literature]. Moscow, 1991. P. 113–169. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kirk R. The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, 2001. 535 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kirk R. The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, 2001. 535 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дёмин И. В. К вопросу об ‘общем знаменателе’ различных типов консерватизма // Политика и общество. 2017. № 9. С. 42–57. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2017.9.23418.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Demin I. V. K voprosu ob ‘obshchem znamenatele’ razlihnykh tipov konservatizma [On the Question of the ‘Common Denominator’ of Different Types of Conservatism] // Politika i obshchestvo. Politics and Society. 2017. No. 9. P. 42–57. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2017.9.23418. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ионин Л. Консерватизм // Логос. 2005. № 3 (48). С. 3–73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ionin L. Konservatizm [Conservatism] // Logos. Logos. 2005. No. 3 (48). P. 3–73. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rayner J. Philosophy into Dogma: The Revival of Cultural Conservatism // British Journal of Political Science. 1986. Vol. 16, № 4. P. 455–473. DOI: 10.1017/S000712340000452X.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rayner J. Philosophy into Dogma: The Revival of Cultural Conservatism // British Journal of Political Science. 1986. Vol. 16, no. 4. P. 455–473. DOI: 10.1017/S000712340000452X. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Trimcev E. Conservatism: Empirical or Metaphysical? // Cosmos+Taxis. 2019. Vol. 6, № 3/4. P. 3–14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trimcev E. Conservatism: Empirical or Metaphysical? // Cosmos+Taxis. 2019. Vol. 6, no. 3/4. P. 3–14. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scruton R. Conservatism. An Invitation to the Great Tradition. New York: St. Martin Press, 2018. 176 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scruton R. Conservatism. An Invitation to the Great Tradition. New York: St. Martin Press, 2018. 176 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хикс С. Объясняя постмодернизм / пер. с англ. А. Шуваловой. Москва: РИПОЛ классик, 2021. 320 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hicks S. Obyasnyaya postmodernizm [Explaining Postmodernism] / trans. from Engl. A. Shuvalovoy. Moscow, 2021. 320 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hunter J. D. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books, 1991. 432 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hunter J. D. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books, 1991. 432 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Куренной В. Исследовательская и политическая программа культурных исследований // Логос. 2012. № 1 (85). С. 14–79.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurennoy V. Issledovatel’skaya i politicheskaya programma kul’turnykh issledovaniy [Research and Policy Program of Cultural Studies] // Logos. Logos. 2012. No. 1 (85). P. 14–79. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций / пер. с англ. Т. Велимеева, Ю. Новикова. Москва: АСТ, 2003. 603 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huntington S. Stolknoveniye tsivilizatsiy [The Clash of Civilizations] / trans. from Engl. T. Velimeeva, Yu. Novikova. Moscow, 2003. 603 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Deneen P. J. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018. 225 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deneen P. J. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018. 225 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Woods T. E. Defending the ‘Little Platoons’; Communitarianism in American Conservatism // American Studies. 1999. Vol. 40, № 3. P. 127–145.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Woods T. E. Defending the ‘Little Platoons’; Communitarianism in American Conservatism // American Studies. 1999. Vol. 40, no. 3. P. 127–145. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бёрк Э. Размышления о революции во Франции / пер. с англ. С. Векслер. London: Overseas Publications Interchange Ltd, 1992. 411 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burke E. Razmyshleniya o revolyutsii vo Frantsii [Reflections on the Revolution in France] / trans. from Engl. S. Vekslera. London: Overseas Publications Interchange Ltd, 1992. 411 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scruton R. Conservative Texts: An Anthology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1991. 352 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scruton R. Conservative Texts: An Anthology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1991. 352 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Константинов М. С., Николаев И. В. Фреймы и концепты морального обоснования консерватизма // Политическая концептология. 2013. № 4. С. 213–226.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Konstantionov M. S., Nikolaev I. V. Freymy i kontsepty moral’nogo obosnovaniya konservatizma [Frames and Concepts of Moral Justification for Conservatism] // Political Conceptology. 2013. No. 4. P. 213–226. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Руткевич Е. Д. Социологическая концепция Роберта Нисбета // Социологический журнал. 1999. № 1/2. С. 27–43.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rutkevich E. D. Sotsiologicheskaya kontseptsiya Roberta Nisbeta [Sociological Concept of Robert Nisbet] // Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal. Sociological Journal. 1999. No. 1/2. P. 27–43. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nisbet R. Conservatives and Libertarians: Uneasy Cousins // Modern Age. 1980. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 2–8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nisbet R. Conservatives and Libertarians: Uneasy Cousins // Modern Age. 1980. Vol. 24, no. 1. P 2–8. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Парфенов А. Д. Либертарианская модель культурного консерватизма // Омский научный вестник. Серия: Общество. История. Современность. 2023. Т. 8, № 3. С. 60–66. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-3-60-66.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Parfenov A. D. Libertarianskaya model’ kul’turnogo konservatizma [Libertarian Model of Cultural Conservatism] // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Seriya: Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost′. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2023. Vol. 8, no. 3. P. 60–66. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-3-60-66. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тённис Ф. Общность и общество: основные понятия чистой социологии / пер. с нем. Д. Скляднева. СанктПетербург: Владимир Даль, 2002. 452 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tönnies F. Obshchnost’ i obshchestvo: osnovnyye ponyatiya chistoy sotsiologii [Community and Society: Basic Concepts in Pure Sociology] / trans. from Germ. D. В. Sklyadneva. Saint Petersburg, 2002. 452 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Henrie M. C. Understanding Traditional Conservatism // Varieties of Conservatism in America / Ed. P. Berkowitz. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2004. P. 1–30.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Henrie M. C. Understanding Traditional Conservatism // Varieties of Conservatism in America / Ed. P. Berkowitz. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2004. P. 1–30. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ireland P. Reflections on a Rampage Through the Barriers of Shame: Law, Community, and the New Conservatism // Journal of Law and Society. 1995. Vol. 22, № 2. P. 189–211. DOI: 10.2307/1410403.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ireland P. Reflections on a Rampage Through the Barriers of Shame: Law, Community, and the New Conservatism // Journal of Law and Society. 1995. Vol. 22, no. 2. P. 189–211. DOI: 10.2307/1410403. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cockram N. R. The Forked Road: Scruton, Grant and the Conservative Critique of Liberalism // Cosmos+Taxis. 2019. Vol. 6, № 3/4. P. 66–77.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cockram N. R. The Forked Road: Scruton, Grant and the Conservative Critique of Liberalism // Cosmos+Taxis. 2019. Vol. 6, no. 3/4. P. 66–77. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nisbet R. Community and Power (formerly The Quest for Community). New York: Oxford University Press, 1962. 303 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nisbet R. A. Community and Power (formerly The Quest for Community). New York: Oxford University Press, 1962. 303 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sheahan L. C. Conservative, Pluralist, Sociologist: Robert Nisbet’s Burke // Studies in Burke and His Time. 2019. Vol. 28. P. 28–63.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sheahan L. C. Conservative, Pluralist, Sociologist: Robert Nisbet’s Burke // Studies in Burke and His Time. 2019. Vol. 28. P. 28–63. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скрутон Р. Как быть консерватором / пер. с англ. Б. Дынина. Москва, 2021. 211 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scruton R. Kak byt’ konservatorom [How to Be a Conservative] / trans. from Engl. B. Dynina. Moscow, 2021. 211 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Drolet J. F., Williams M. C. America First: Paleoconservatism and the Ideological Struggle for the American Right // Journal of the Political Ideologies. 2020. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 28–50. DOI: 10.1080/13569317.2020.1699717.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Drolet J. F., Williams M. C. America First: Paleoconservatism and the Ideological Struggle for the American Right // Journal of the Political Ideologies. 2020. Vol. 25, no. 1. P. 28–50. DOI: 10.1080/13569317.2020.1699717. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Готфрид П. Палеоконсерваторы: правые изгои Америки / пер. с англ. П. Паршина // Тетради по консерватизму. 2016. № 1. С. 77–84. DOI: 10.24030/2409-2517-2016-1-77-84.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottfried P. Paleokonseratory: pravye izgoi Ameriki [Paleoconservatives: America’s Right-Wing Outcasts] / trans. by Engl. P. Parshina // Tetradi po konservatizmu. Notebooks on Conservatism. 2016. No. 1. P. 77–84. DOI: 10.24030/2409-2517-2016-1-77-84. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hoppe H.-H. Democracy: The God That Failed. The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2007. 304 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hoppe H.-H. Democracy: The God That Failed. The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2007. 304 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sheahan L. C. State, Community, and Individual: Robert Nisbet and Freedom of Association in American Constitutionalism: Ph. D. Dissertation in Political Sciences. Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America, 2016. 286 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sheahan L. C. State, Community, and Individual: Robert Nisbet and Freedom of Association in American Constitutionalism: Ph. D. Dissertation in Political Sciences. Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America, 2016. 286 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nisbet R. A. The New Despotism // Studies in Social Theory. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for Humane Studies, 1976. № 6. P. 3–34.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nisbet R. A. The New Despotism // Studies in Social Theory No. 6. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for Humane Studies, 1976. P. 3–34. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nisbet R. A. The Quest for Community: A Study in the Ethics of Order and Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press, 1953. 303 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nisbet R. A. The Quest for Community: A Study in the Ethics of Order and Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press, 1953. 303 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Канарш Г. Ю. Справедливость и идея сообщества // Знание. Понимание. Умение. 2010. № 4. С. 77–86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kanarsh G. Yu. Spravedlivost’ i ideya soobshchestva [Justice and Community Idea] // Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye. Knowledge. Understanding. Skills. 2010. No. 4. P. 77–86. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">MacIntyre A. The Nature of the Virtues // The Hastings Center Report. 1981. Vol. 11, № 2. P. 27–34. DOI: 10.2307/3561072.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">MacIntyre A. The Nature of the Virtues // The Hastings Center Report. 1981. Vol. 11, no. 2. P. 27–34. DOI: 10.2307/3561072. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Young D. E. A Dead End in Alasdair MacIntyre’s Political Thought? Institutions, Pluralism, and the Liberal Tradition // Journal of Religion, Culture &amp; Democracy. 2022. Vol. 1. P. 1–16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Young D. E. A Dead End in Alasdair MacIntyre’s Political Thought? Institutions, Pluralism, and the Liberal Tradition // Journal of Religion, Culture &amp; Democracy. 2022. Vol. 1. P. 1–16. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Грей Дж. Поминки по Просвещению: политика и культура на закате современности / пер. с англ. Е. Переяславцевой, Е. Рудницкой, М. Фетисова. Москва: Праксис, 2003. 368 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gray J. Pominki po Prosveshcheniyu: Politika i kul’tura na zakate sovremennosti [Enlightenment’s Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age] / trans. from Engl. E. Pereyaslavtsevoy, E. Rudnitskoy, M. Fetisova. Moscow, 2003. 368 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gray J. Two Faces of Liberalism. New York: The New Press, 2002. 161 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gray J. Two Faces of Liberalism. New York: The New Press, 2002. 161 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scruton R. The Significance of Common Culture // Philosophy. 1979. Vol. 54, № 207. P. 51–70. DOI: 10.1017/s0031819100024876.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scruton R. The Significance of Common Culture // Philosophy. 1979. Vol. 54, no. 207. P. 51–70. DOI: 10.1017/s0031819100024876. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scruton R. Modern Culture. London: Bloomsbury, 2018. 192 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scruton R. Modern Culture. London: Bloomsbury, 2018. 192 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scruton R. England and the Need for Nations. London: Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society, 2004. 54 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scruton R. England and the Need for Nations. London: Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society, 2004. 54 p. (In Engl.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
